Future boundary
Which unresolved paths are still admissible, which are excluded by evidence, and which remain explicit trust assumptions?
A workflow can still be open after one decision has become stable enough to rely on.
Reliance Inspector shows the evidence, assumptions, semantic identities, stability margin, and action bound behind that narrower decision. It lets you inspect why a relying result is SUPPORTED, why it must be REQUALIFY, or why matching numbers still become NOT_APPLICABLE.
Which unresolved paths are still admissible, which are excluded by evidence, and which remain explicit trust assumptions?
Across that qualified future boundary, how much can the claim move before its verdict changes?
How much can the proposed action itself worsen the same claim, including qualified post-action expansion?
Do the certificate, action bound, and relying party agree on the exact claim, unit, boundary, profile, and trust identity?
rely()SUPPORTED means semantic applicability, not permission. It does not infer authorization, reserve capacity, or guarantee a concurrent commit.
Each stage answers a different question. No later stage repairs an unqualified earlier one.
The interval is one commissioning measurement, not a performance average.
Paths removed by recorded evidence rather than assumption.
Accepted conditions that remain part of the claim boundary and are not promoted into evidence.
The full local release verifies a compatible recorded evidence ZIP, rebuilds the claim-specific boundary and derivations, and emits a deterministic verification record. The public website deliberately does not receive or process that bundle.
Recheck the evidence manifest and bundle identity.
Separate evidenced exclusions from explicit trust assumptions.
Reconstruct the margin, qualified action bound, and relying result.
Emit exact evidence, verifier, and semantic-core identities.
The local evaluator consumes a stability certificate, qualified action bound, and relying context. It requires exact semantic and trust identity before applying the frozen threshold-slack rule.
Claim, profile, unit, boundary, and trust identity must match.
For stable SATISFIED, support requires Cₐ ≤ M. The VIOLATED case uses the strict bound.
Return SUPPORTED, REQUALIFY, or NOT_APPLICABLE without inferring authorization or reservation.